These are further revised results, owing to correction of data entry errors that had pairs 4 and 6 reversed; same for pairs 3 and 7. Congratulations now to Bev Chance and Taylor Lyen, and applause to newcomer Ann Crenshaw and partner Phyllis Beyrer for a very creditable showing. Sorry for the confusion. Note, by the way, the traffic jam around the pairs who came in 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th: 4/10ths of a matchpoint (25.08 - 24.68) separated these four. What's more, between the 2nd and 3rd place pairs there was only a scant 2/100ths of a matchpoint, even less than that that separated the 4th and 5th place pairs (4/100ths). Jim EVENT> Tuesday Evening 49er Pairs |SESSION> Tuesday Eve |SECTION> A -----------------------,------------------,----------------------------------------------------- DATE> August 14, 2007 |CLUB NO.> 257667 | 08/17/2007 11:58 ------------------,-----------------------------------------------,----------------------------- DIR> Jim Solomon |RATING> Club Masterpoint (60%, 40%, 30% Open) |MOVEMENT> HOWELL (One Winner) -----------,--------,--------------------,------------------------------------------------------ AVE> 22.5 |TOP> 3 |MP LIMITS> 50/15/5 |CLUB> Fremont Lake Elizabeth Easybridge Club ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=7/C=4 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------, -------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section | No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards | ------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 1 Lily Lee Shun Lee C 2 1 1 25.08 55.73 0.38(A) 3 Les Addison Jo Callahan A . . . 24.94 55.42 4 Bev Chance Taylor Lyen B 4 3 . 24.98 55.51 0.19(A) 5 C. W. Huang Gloria Uhl C . . . 18.84 41.87 6 Phyllis Beyrer Ann Crenshaw C . . . 20.14 44.76 7 Dave Minor Louise Minor B . . . 24.68 54.84 8 Betty Howd Dug Howd A 1 . . 30.36 67.47 0.54(A) 9 Don Gillis Camille Gillis B 3 2 . 25.06 55.69 0.27(A) 10 Fran Nakamura Ruth Davis C . . 2 22.79 50.64 0.08(C) Totals 216.87 **PAIRS** BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \/ 1> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- -420* ---- ---- ---- 420 ---- ---- ---- 2> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- 170* ---- ---- ---- -170 ---- ---- ---- 3> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- 180* ---- ---- ---- -180 ---- ---- ---- 4> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- ---- -100* ---- ---- ---- 100 ---- ---- 5> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- ---- -690* ---- ---- ---- 690 ---- ---- 6> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- ---- -300* ---- ---- ---- 300 ---- ---- 7> 2.83 0.17 1- 2.83 1- 0.17 100* ---- -650* ---- -630* 650 ---- ---- 630 -100 8> 1- 2.83 0.17 0.17 2.83 1- -110* ---- PASS* ---- -140* PASS ---- ---- 140 110 9> 2.83 1- 0.17 1- 2.83 0.17 100* ---- -200* ---- -420* 200 ---- ---- 420 -100 10> 2.83 1- 0.17 1- 2.83 0.17 630 ---- ---- 100* ---- -630* -100 800* -800 ---- 11> 2.83 1- 0.17 1- 2.83 0.17 100 ---- ---- 520* ---- -100* -520 590* -590 ---- 12> 1.65 1.95 1.95 1.65 NP ---- ---- -600* ---- NP* 600 100* -100 ---- 13> 0 2 2- - - 2- 3 1 -600 ---- 200* 100 -100* -100* ---- 100 600* -200 14> 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 2 -100 ---- -140* 420 50* -420* ---- -50 100* 140 15> 0.17 1- 0.17 2.83 2.83 1- -170 ---- 140* NP -100* NP* ---- 100 170* -140 16> 0.17 0.83 2.17 2.17 0.83 2.83 ---- ---- ---- -100* -150 150* 150* ---- -150 100 17> 2.17 2.83 2.17 0.17 0.83 0.83 ---- ---- ---- 100* PASS 100* PASS* ---- -100 -100 18> 0.17 1- 2.83 1- 0.17 2.83 ---- ---- ---- -50* -110 300* 110* ---- -300 50 19> 1.65 1.65 1.95 1.95 ---- ---- ---- ---- 660* -690 ---- 690* ---- -660 20> 1.95 1.95 1.65 1.65 ---- ---- ---- ---- 620* 170 ---- -170* ---- -620 21> 1.80 1.80 ---- ---- ---- ---- -50* NP ---- NP* ---- 50 22> 1.65 1.95 1.65 1.95 ---- ---- -90* 90 ---- ---- -50 ---- 50* ---- 23> 1.95 1.65 1.95 1.65 ---- ---- 170* -170 ---- ---- -140 ---- 140* ---- 24> 1.95 1.65 1.95 1.65 ---- ---- 480* -480 ---- ---- -140 ---- 140* ---- 25> 1.80 1.80 -450* ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 450 ---- ---- 26> 1.80 1.80 -650* ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 650 ---- ---- 27> 1.80 1.80 -480* ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 480 ---- ---- PAIR SUMMARIES Summary for Pair A 1 Lily Lee - Shun Lee Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum C Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 7 S BOTH E-W 10 100 2.83 14 E NONE N-S 9 -100 0 8 W NONE E-W 10 -110 1.5 15 S N-S N-S 9 -170 0.17 9 N E-W E-W 10 100 2.83 25 N E-W E-W 8 -450 1.8 10 E BOTH N-S 6 630 2.83 26 E BOTH E-W 8 -650 1.8 11 S NONE N-S 6 100 2.83 27 S NONE E-W 8 -480 1.8 13 N BOTH N-S 9 -600 0 TOTAL: 18.39 SESSION SCORE: 25.08 PERCENT: 55.73 Session rank: 2(A) 1(B) 1(C) MASTER POINTS: 0.38 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 3 Les Addison - Jo Callahan Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum A Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE E-W 7 -420 1.8 13 N BOTH E-W 10 200 2 2 E N-S E-W 7 170 1.8 14 E NONE E-W 10 -140 1 3 S E-W E-W 7 180 1.8 15 S N-S E-W 10 140 1.5 7 S BOTH E-W 6 -650 0.17 22 E E-W E-W 4 -90 1.65 8 W NONE E-W 6 PASS 2.83 23 S BOTH E-W 4 170 1.95 9 N E-W E-W 6 -200 1.5 24 W NONE E-W 4 480 1.95 TOTAL: 19.95 SESSION SCORE: 24.94 PERCENT: 55.42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 4 Bev Chance - Taylor Lyen Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum B Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 4 W BOTH E-W 8 -100 1.8 14 E NONE N-S 6 420 3 5 N N-S E-W 8 -690 1.8 16 W E-W E-W 10 -100 0.17 6 E E-W E-W 8 -300 1.8 17 N NONE E-W 10 100 2.17 10 E BOTH E-W 7 100 1.5 18 E N-S E-W 10 -50 0.17 11 S NONE E-W 7 520 1.5 22 E E-W N-S 3 90 1.95 12 W N-S E-W 7 -600 1.65 23 S BOTH N-S 3 -170 1.65 13 N BOTH N-S 6 100 2.5 24 W NONE N-S 3 -480 1.65 TOTAL: 23.31 SESSION SCORE: 24.98 PERCENT: 55.51 Session rank: 4(A) 3(B) MASTER POINTS: 0.19 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 5 C. W. Huang - Gloria Uhl Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum C Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 7 S BOTH E-W 9 -630 1.5 16 W E-W N-S 7 -150 0.83 8 W NONE E-W 9 -140 0.17 17 N NONE N-S 7 PASS 2.83 9 N E-W E-W 9 -420 0.17 18 E N-S N-S 7 -110 1.5 13 N BOTH E-W 8 -100 0.5 19 S E-W E-W 10 660 1.65 14 E NONE E-W 8 50 2 20 W BOTH E-W 10 620 1.95 15 S N-S E-W 8 -100 0.17 21 N N-S E-W 10 -50 1.8 TOTAL: 15.07 SESSION SCORE: 18.84 PERCENT: 41.87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 6 Phyllis Beyrer - Ann Crenshaw Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum C Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 7 S BOTH N-S 3 650 2.83 14 E NONE E-W 4 -420 0 8 W NONE N-S 3 PASS 0.17 16 W E-W E-W 9 150 2.17 9 N E-W N-S 3 200 1.5 17 N NONE E-W 9 100 2.17 10 E BOTH E-W 1 -630 0.17 18 E N-S E-W 9 300 2.83 11 S NONE E-W 1 -100 0.17 19 S E-W N-S 8 -690 1.65 13 N BOTH E-W 4 -100 0.5 20 W BOTH N-S 8 170 1.95 TOTAL: 16.11 SESSION SCORE: 20.14 PERCENT: 44.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 7 Dave Minor - Louise Minor Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum B Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE N-S 3 420 1.8 16 W E-W E-W 5 150 2.17 2 E N-S N-S 3 -170 1.8 17 N NONE E-W 5 PASS 0.17 3 S E-W N-S 3 -180 1.8 18 E N-S E-W 5 110 1.5 10 E BOTH N-S 4 -100 1.5 22 E E-W N-S 9 -50 1.65 11 S NONE N-S 4 -520 1.5 23 S BOTH N-S 9 -140 1.95 12 W N-S N-S 4 600 1.95 24 W NONE N-S 9 -140 1.95 TOTAL: 19.74 SESSION SCORE: 24.68 PERCENT: 54.84 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 8 Betty Howd - Dug Howd Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum A Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 4 W BOTH N-S 4 100 1.8 14 E NONE N-S 5 -50 1 5 N N-S N-S 4 690 1.8 15 S N-S N-S 5 100 2.83 6 E E-W N-S 4 300 1.8 19 S E-W E-W 6 690 1.95 10 E BOTH E-W 9 800 2.83 20 W BOTH E-W 6 -170 1.65 11 S NONE E-W 9 590 2.83 25 N E-W N-S 1 450 1.8 12 W N-S E-W 9 100 1.95 26 E BOTH N-S 1 650 1.8 13 N BOTH N-S 5 100 2.5 27 S NONE N-S 1 480 1.8 TOTAL: 28.34 SESSION SCORE: 30.36 PERCENT: 67.47 Session rank: 1(A) MASTER POINTS: 0.54 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 9 Don Gillis - Camille Gillis Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum B Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 7 S BOTH N-S 5 630 1.5 15 S N-S E-W 1 170 2.83 8 W NONE N-S 5 140 2.83 16 W E-W N-S 6 -150 0.83 9 N E-W N-S 5 420 2.83 17 N NONE N-S 6 -100 0.83 10 E BOTH N-S 8 -800 0.17 18 E N-S N-S 6 -300 0.17 11 S NONE N-S 8 -590 0.17 22 E E-W E-W 7 50 1.95 12 W N-S N-S 8 -100 1.65 23 S BOTH E-W 7 140 1.65 13 N BOTH E-W 1 600 3 24 W NONE E-W 7 140 1.65 14 E NONE E-W 1 100 3 TOTAL: 25.06 SESSION SCORE: 25.06 PERCENT: 55.69 Session rank: 3(A) 2(B) MASTER POINTS: 0.27 Black (Stratum A) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary for Pair A 10 Fran Nakamura - Ruth Davis Tuesday Eve. 49er Pairs Stratum C Tuesday Eve Session August 14, 2007 Fremont Lake Elizabeth Ea 257667 Average: 22.5 Top on a Board: 3 BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL DIR VS RESULT SCORE 7 S BOTH N-S 1 -100 0.17 16 W E-W N-S 4 100 2.83 8 W NONE N-S 1 110 1.5 17 N NONE N-S 4 -100 0.83 9 N E-W N-S 1 -100 0.17 18 E N-S N-S 4 50 2.83 13 N BOTH N-S 3 -200 1 19 S E-W N-S 5 -660 1.95 14 E NONE N-S 3 140 2 20 W BOTH N-S 5 -620 1.65 15 S N-S N-S 3 -140 1.5 21 N N-S N-S 5 50 1.8 TOTAL: 18.23 SESSION SCORE: 22.79 PERCENT: 50.64 Session rank: 2(C) MASTER POINTS: 0.08 Black (Stratum C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TRAVELING SCORES RESULTS OF BOARD 1 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 1.80 1.80 7-Minor-Minor vs 3-Addison-Callahan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 2 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 170 1.80 1.80 7-Minor-Minor vs 3-Addison-Callahan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 3 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 180 1.80 1.80 7-Minor-Minor vs 3-Addison-Callahan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 4 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 4-Chance-Lyen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 5 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 690 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 4-Chance-Lyen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 6 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 300 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 4-Chance-Lyen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 7 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 630 1.50 1.50 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 5-Huang-Uhl 650 2.83 0.17 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw vs 3-Addison-Callahan 100 0.17 2.83 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 1-Lee-Lee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 8 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 2.83 0.17 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 5-Huang-Uhl PASS 0.17 2.83 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw vs 3-Addison-Callahan 110 1.50 1.50 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 1-Lee-Lee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 2.83 0.17 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 5-Huang-Uhl 200 1.50 1.50 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw vs 3-Addison-Callahan 100 0.17 2.83 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 1-Lee-Lee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 10 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 630 2.83 0.17 1-Lee-Lee vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw 100 1.50 1.50 7-Minor-Minor vs 4-Chance-Lyen 800 0.17 2.83 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 8-Howd-Howd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 11 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 2.83 0.17 1-Lee-Lee vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw 520 1.50 1.50 7-Minor-Minor vs 4-Chance-Lyen 590 0.17 2.83 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 8-Howd-Howd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 12 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 600 1.95 1.65 7-Minor-Minor vs 4-Chance-Lyen 100 1.65 1.95 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 8-Howd-Howd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 13 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 2.50 0.50 8-Howd-Howd vs 5-Huang-Uhl 200 1.00 2.00 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 3-Addison-Callahan 600 0.00 3.00 1-Lee-Lee vs 9-Gillis-Gillis 100 2.50 0.50 4-Chance-Lyen vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 14 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 50 1.00 2.00 8-Howd-Howd vs 5-Huang-Uhl 140 2.00 1.00 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 3-Addison-Callahan 100 0.00 3.00 1-Lee-Lee vs 9-Gillis-Gillis 420 3.00 0.00 4-Chance-Lyen vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 15 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 2.83 0.17 8-Howd-Howd vs 5-Huang-Uhl 140 1.50 1.50 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 3-Addison-Callahan 170 0.17 2.83 1-Lee-Lee vs 9-Gillis-Gillis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 16 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 150 0.83 2.17 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw 100 2.83 0.17 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 4-Chance-Lyen 150 0.83 2.17 5-Huang-Uhl vs 7-Minor-Minor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 17 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 0.83 2.17 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw 100 0.83 2.17 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 4-Chance-Lyen PASS 2.83 0.17 5-Huang-Uhl vs 7-Minor-Minor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 18 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 300 0.17 2.83 9-Gillis-Gillis vs 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw 50 2.83 0.17 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 4-Chance-Lyen 110 1.50 1.50 5-Huang-Uhl vs 7-Minor-Minor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 19 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 660 1.95 1.65 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 5-Huang-Uhl 690 1.65 1.95 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw vs 8-Howd-Howd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 20 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 620 1.65 1.95 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 5-Huang-Uhl 170 1.95 1.65 6-Beyrer-Crenshaw vs 8-Howd-Howd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 21 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 50 1.80 1.80 10-Nakamura-Davis vs 5-Huang-Uhl ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 22 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 90 1.95 1.65 4-Chance-Lyen vs 3-Addison-Callahan 50 1.65 1.95 7-Minor-Minor vs 9-Gillis-Gillis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 23 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 170 1.65 1.95 4-Chance-Lyen vs 3-Addison-Callahan 140 1.95 1.65 7-Minor-Minor vs 9-Gillis-Gillis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 24 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 480 1.65 1.95 4-Chance-Lyen vs 3-Addison-Callahan 140 1.95 1.65 7-Minor-Minor vs 9-Gillis-Gillis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 25 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 450 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 1-Lee-Lee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 26 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 650 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 1-Lee-Lee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF BOARD 27 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 480 1.80 1.80 8-Howd-Howd vs 1-Lee-Lee ----------------------------------------------------------------------